LIBER CASUS ASTRUM vel XCVIII
by Frater M.E.D.
MXMLXXVII E.V.
Exactly who or what was Charles Stansfeld
Jones? If Jones was the Magical Child, the Son of the Beast 666, why did
he not answer the riddle of the Second Chapter, the 76th verse of LIBER
AL VEL LEGIS? Why did the Master Therion learn to dislike and disapprove
of him? This I shall try to shed some light upon within these few pages.
Charles Robert John Stansfeld Jones (April
2, 1886-1950) of "Tall Timbers", Deep Cove, British Columbia, Canada, was
a rather tall and angular character. What he was before he was recognized
as the Child of Promise is of no importance, for he was at that time of
no importance. We are concerned with what he became, as a result of a series
of magical workings performed by Soror Hilarion (Jane Foster, "the Cat")
and the Great Beast 666 (Aleister Crowley) c. 1915 E.V..
Jones, known variously as Frater Achad,
Parzival, and V.I.O.O.I.V., discovered the Key to THE BOOK OF THE LAW in
1917 E.V., changing the title of that book from LIBER L. vel LEGIS to LIBER
AL vel LEGIS, and causing several obscure passages within that Book to
be understood by the Beast. For this, and perhaps a few miscellaneous fragments
of thought, Thelema owes a great deal to Jones, but not as a great man--rather
as a temporary vehicle for That which was greater than he.
Jones signed the Probationer's pledge form
on December 24, 1909, Christmas Eve, and it seems to have overly influenced
him throughout his entire life. The first rule that he was to follow, as
stated in his diary, was to "Ever be moderate and follow the middle path;
rather be the tortoise than the hare; do not rush wildly into anything;
but do not abandon what you have taken up, without much forethought." Yet
he made a terrific rush up the Tree of Life. From his Magical Diary of
1918: "...it seemed quite certain that I was upon the Path of Aleph, which
uniteth Chokmah with the Crown... I was just as clearly convinced that
I had Attained the Grade of 10°=1°..." And again: "...I decided to reverse
the Grade and take that of a simple 1°=10° or Neophyte, thus as it were,
plunging down the Middle Pillar of the Tree of Life and uniting Kether
and Malkuth in my own Being. (Note V.I.O. = 86 a Number asserting this
identity, thus foreshadowing this Attainment, as all His [Jones] other
Mottoes seem to do. And THERION [this was in Greek - ED] has said, One
cannot get away from the fulfillment of Mottoes)." 86 is the numeration
of AHIH ADNI, Eheieh Adonai, I am (the) Lord; Eheieh being the God-Name
of Kether and Adonai being the God-Name of Malkuth. Continuing from his
diary: "Then correspondence began between myself and Therion, and He admitted
my 8°=3° Grade, but would not consider the possibility of the Path of Aleph,
10°=1° etc. explaining my taking 1°=10° again as my being 'Cast out into Malkuth',
although, as a matter of fact, I made no claim except to Neophyte. He
also realized that this must be the 'child' prophesied unto him in Liber
Legis, and claimed me as His Son." However, as I have said before, he did
not answer the riddle of AL. "Verse 76. I don't make this out yet, but
it seems to indicate that it will not come till later, after the Prophet's
[A.C.] time..." It is the answer to this riddle that will prove the Child.
But does this prove that Jones was not the Magical Child?
C.S.Jones was a man, perhaps a "soul" that
had need of a certain uplifting and fall to fulfill the cause and effect
laws of Karma. He was not a particularly strong man, nor was he much of
anything. What C.S.Jones was was a PERFECT VEHICLE FOR THE TEMPORARY USE
OF THE MAGICAL CHILD, WHO, AT THAT TIME, HAD TO MANIFEST FOR A SHORT WHILE,
BUT COULD NOT MAINTAIN TWO SEPARATE VEHICLES AT THE SAME TIME. Students
are continuously making the mistake of thinking, for example, that the
persona Aleister Crowley was the Logos of the æon, and in a most important
sense this was not so. Aleister Crowley was a perfectly constructed instrument
created for the use of the Logos of the Æon of Horus. He was not perfect
in a personal, microcosmic sense, but he was perfect in a macrocosmic sense.
The PERSONALITY of Aleister Crowley was a marvelous tool constructed and
employed by the Logos. This does not mean that A.C. was not the Logos,
it simply means that he, as a PERSON, was not the Logos; and remember that
PERSONA means "mask". Crowley was a very well-tailored suit for the Logos
to wear, and there will never be another like him again! [Which is why
those who claim to be A.C. "reincarnated," or "the Beast 666 Reborn", are
bigger fools than they realize. That personality was annihilated by the
Logos after it had served its purpose, and what is Not cannot Be.] Now,
getting back to Jones and the Child, let me first say that indeed, Jones
did reach the highest heights of the Tree of Life. However, it was because
the Child "entered" him, so to speak, and raised him by It's power. It
was due to this "possession" and ascent by the Child that Jones found the
Key to THE BOOK OF THE LAW. Then, when the tool known as Charles Stansfeld
Jones was no longer needed, the Child abandoned that tool. Left alone at
the highest heights, without the power of the Child, Jones plunged down
to the deepest depths, back into the lower levels of Malkuth. From that
time on whenever Jones looked up from the depths to the heights he believed
himself to be looking down from the heights to the depths. His entire Point
of View had been reversed. Thus: "I recognized magick as concerned to reverse
any existing order", Jones once explained. Aleister Crowley, in MAGICK
IN THEORY AND PRACTICE, referred to Jones as "One who ought to have known
better tried to improve the Tree of Life by turning the Serpent of Wisdom
upside down! Yet he could not even make his scheme symmetrical: his little
remaining good sense revolted at the supreme atrocities. Yet he succeeded
in reducing the whole Magical Alphabet to nonsense, and shewing that he
never understood its real meaning." Note that "he", i.e. the personality
of Jones, never understood the meaning of the Magical Alphabet, but the
Child did, and this is just one of the pointers to the dual nature of C.S.
Jones in 1917. In Crowley's Magical Diary of 1920 E.V. he says "Thus Parzival
is a Fool, to look at from below..." In this case Therion was not praising
Jones as a Divine Fool, but rather chiding him as a common fool, for he
looked at everything from below while he thought that he was perceiving
life from Above.
In Jones' diary of 1911 he stated on March
28th: "...I have conceived within my womb a child. Or is it that I have
for the first time realized that I have a womb? Yet it is so, that 'blank'
within, into which I have projected my thoughts, and from which they have
come forth again 'living' is for a greater purpose. Can I not form there
a child that shall be MYSELF made from the highest ideals, the essence
of my pains, refined and purified, freed from dross by the living fire?
This life of Service must be lived till I am 'selfless' in all that I knew
as myself; but all the time will not my 'child' be growing within me, composed
of finer materials?" This "child" was not HIS child. Jones, recognizing
himself as of no consequence, wished to be more. Don't we all? He created
within himself a vacuum and desired it to be filled with something greater
than himself; he desired it to be filled with the Child. When Therion and
Hilarion performed their magick there was a perfect vehicle ready, drawing
forth that entity that the Beast was invoking. Thus was the Child born
within the body, as it were, of Charles Stansfeld Jones. But this could
not last for long, for the Child was of the Father, and to borrow a bit
from another source, "I and my Father are One."
To continue with the 1911 diary of C.S.Jones:
Sunday, April 2, "During practice I had a distinct consciousness of the
'centre of consciousness' being not 'within' as usual, but above head."
For a time, it seems, the Child could not fully inhabit Jones, but instead
overshadowed him. Another pointer as to the true nature of Jones was the
statement made in his diary of April 8, Saturday, "...The New God [Jones]
wills to be Nothing and becomes??????" i.e. creates a vacuum within himself
and allows the Child to Become. Dated in his diary October 11, 1912, 12.30
a.m., which was the eve of Crowley's 37th birthday, Jones wrote "So did
the day start and I knelt at the altar from 12 Midnight until 12.28. During
this time did my Lord Adonai begin to manifest within me [i.e. the Child,
not the H.G.A. as he believed], so that my being was wrapped away in bliss
ineffable." This points to the difference between Jones and the Child.
In 1913, in an entry dated April 13, while meditating in his favourite
position, the Dragon, Jones wrote "A certain bliss arose at the thought
that I was but a little child of the Great Father. Joy. Joy." In a summary
comment by Fra. O.M. 7°=4° [A.C.] it was written: "...You [Jones] are emotional.
This is very bad, and must be got rid of. It's a form of Egoism, and leads
to the Left-hand Path [i.e. personal aggrandizement as opposed to selfless
Work, without the lust of result]. Don't allow yourself to think that your
own point of view is the only one. ...if you fail to understand, you will
go mad when you come to a certain Gate." And without the continued support
of the Child, he did come to that Gate, and he did go mad as the Master
Therion had warned.
After his fall, Jones proved his insanity,
his loss of Self, by reversing everything. He reversed his motto, V.I.O.O.I.V.
[Unus in Omnibus, Omnia in Uno] to O.I.V.V.I.O.. He wrote several books
and in Q.B.L., or THE BRIDE'S RECEPTION, privately issued by him in 1922,
and THE ANATOMY OF THE BODY OF GOD his mania for reversing everything caused
him to turn the Tree of Life virtually upside down! He began to think of
himself as a new Messiah, powerful enough to redeem all of mankind from
the destructions of the Æon of Horus, which he had read into LIBER AL
VEL LEGIS. Jones created the Fellowship of Ma-Ion which he, somehow, managed
to combine with membership in the Catholic Church. It can here be seen
that he had, perhaps unwittingly, allied himself with the Black Brothers.
It was on the 2nd of April in 1948, after Crowley's death on December 1st,
1947 E.V., that Jones announced the arrival of Ma-Ion. This would mean
that the Æon of Horus had lasted for only about 44 years instead of approximately
2,000. A very unlikely occurrence to say the least. He also claimed that
this date in 1948 marked the real beginning of the Age of Aquarius! That
should interest some astrologers that you might know [or be]! Jones based
his cult of Ma-Ion upon a "revelation" concerning the last verse of the
first chapter of The Book; that verse being "The Manifestation of Nuit
is at an end." Amongst a mess of pseudo-qabalistic jargon he showed the
hidden meaning of the word "Manifestation" to be MA and ION, "ion" being
a form of "æon" or "eon". Thus MA-ION--the Æon of Ma[at]. Of course this
verse of The Book actually refers to the manifestation of Nuit, through
Aiwass, to A.C. in Cairo, coming to an end, and also to the end of the
Æon of Isis, which preceded the Æon of Osiris. You will note that C.S.Jones
did not announce his manufactured aeon and Fellowship until after Crowley's
death. He also did such things as claim in a letter that Crowley's asthma
was the direct result of a deliberate attempt by the Beast to destroy Ruby
Jones, his wife. Ruby suffered from asthma and supposedly this attack backfired
and transferred the ailment to Crowley. Of course, as with much of what
Jones said after his fall, this is totally absurd, for Crowley had always
attributed this illness to his climbing experience with Kanchenjunga [pronounced
KAHN chen JOONG gah]. A.C. referred to his asthma as having been "exacted
by the God of the Mountains", and this ascent predated the fairy tale that
Jones created.
As with everything else, Jones also invented
a word, claiming that the Beast had failed to utter the Word of the Æon.
This word was ALLALA or ALALA, which supposedly means 'God (is) Not Not',
AL being God and LA being Not. This is so obviously manufactured that no
lengthy comment is necessary.
One of the statements that really showed
the extent of Jones' fall was that he had claimed that he remained in the
Abyss for an entire cycle of Saturn, that is, twenty-nine years! [From
1916 to 1945.] One having any knowledge whatsoever concerning the Abyss
knows that the horrors and tremendous disintegrating influences that make
up that void are impossible to endure for more than a few fleeting seconds
of earth calculated time for the greatest of adepts. Most magicians are
turned away from the Abyss, unable to enter it. Jones was simply confusing
the Abyss with the lowest realms of Malkuth--the World of Shells.
Have I left anything unsaid? Ah yes! I
said that Jones was a "Perfect vehicle for the Temporary use of the Magical
Child, who, at that time, had to manifest for a short while, but could
not maintain TWO SEPARATE VEHICLES at the same time." So if Jones was only
one of the vehicles used by the Child, and that for a brief duration, who
was the second, and more lasting vehicle for the Child? Crowley himself,
naturally! The Child, being a divine relfection of Horus on earth, was
the Logos of the Æon, which manifested Itself in the Person of Its carefully
constructed, perfected vehicle, Aleister Crowley, who, quite often, formulated
his astral body into a golden hawk or other such symbols of Horus [Ra-Hoor-Khuit]!
"I and my Father are One". "...a little child of the Great Father." Tiphareth
is the reflection of Kether; Vau of Yod. Horus is the son of Osiris, and
yet Osiris reborn. LIBER AL, Ch. III, v. 47, "It shall be his child &
that strangely." The Logos of the Æon, for some reason unable or unwilling
to communicate the Key of The Book directly to A.C., arranged events to
make it possible to manifest Itself, for a brief time, as the Child that
It would manifest Itself as later, into the person of Charles Stansfeld
Jones. Upon communicating the Key, the Entity known as the Logos, AND AS
THE CHILD, abandoned Jones and resumed Its position as the Father alone.
Jones may as well have been dead after
discovering the Key, for then the "Child" had left him and his usefulness
to Thelema and the Æon of Horus had come to an end.
Upon Crowley's death, the Logos, the Beast
666, withdrew from this plane of manifestation.
Will the Logos ever return as the Magical
Child of the Beast 666?
Have all the riddles, especially of the
third chapter of THE BOOK OF THE LAW been answered yet? And what of the
76th verse of Chapter II? Does that not yet need to be answered?
I think that we can safely assume that
the Promised One mentioned in LIBER AL VEL LEGIS, the Magical Child of
the Beast 666, is yet to manifest Himself, for a longer period of time,
on this material plane of existence. He will come and I dare say his coming
will not be too far off in the future, and he will give the proof of His
existence and solve the remaining riddles of THE BOOK OF THE LAW.
Aumgn. Ha.
(TNN.I.2.1-5, 2/19/78 E.V.)
Back to the
Home Page
|